Welcome back to the 1980s
Aug. 9th, 2012 05:49 amToday has been a day filled with frustration, and disbelief that this is 2012 and we are still having to deal with this insanity.
This afternoon I read
leonie_alastair's post alerting me to Bret Easton Ellis' Twitter tirade on why Matt Bomer is too gay to be cast in Fifty Shades of Grey. You can read his tweets on his Twitter page, or read the reports on the controversy at Huffington Post, The Hollywood Gossip or BuzzFocus (warnings for homophobia or references to homophobia on all the above).
Now, whilst I personally think Fifty Shades is an appallingly written book, I do think the film may turn out to be quite good in the right hands, and I think Matt would make an amazing Christian. Is that the point? No. The point is that no actor should be discriminated against based on their private life. If we allow actors' romantic lives to determine what roles they can and can't play, we are sentencing actors and actresses who are concerned about their careers to a lifetime in the closet.
There's also a serious double standard going on here. Nobody raises an eyebrow when a straight man is cast in a gay role. Nobody said that Heath Ledger was unrealistic in Brokeback Mountain because in real life he didn't really sleep with men. Sean Penn played a gay man in Milk, won an Oscar, and was praised for his daring, despite having had two high-profile marriages to women. And yet today Ellis stated that Matt playing Christian would be 'ludicrous', that the resulting press tour would be 'an embarrassing fiasco' and that what was needed was 'an intensely straight actor wanting absolutely to screw Ana Steele'. This makes so little sense that my mind boggles. How do we know any actor is 'intensely straight'? How do we know, even if the chosen actor is straight, that he will be attracted to the actress playing Ana, or that he will enjoy the BDSM lifestyle? We don't. We don't need to. That's why it's called acting. Christian, not the actor playing him, is the one that needs to want to 'screw Ana'.
I knew better than to hope that this opinion was limited to Ellis - I had already seen glimpses of it in Youtube comments - but I was pretty appalled to see that it was also relatively prevalent in the comments on the articles which report Ellis' tweets. People commenting they would be unable to believe him in the role because they know he's sleeping with a man, people commenting that he would be unable to construct any onscreen chemistry with a woman... it's enough to make me despair.
Matt is an excellent actor who plays a convincing straight man on White Collar and has led millions of women to fall for Neal Caffrey. If he wants the role, he deserves the chance to be considered, just like any other actor. We should not be pigeonholing actors as only able to play gay or straight roles, any more than we should stop married actors from playing single roles.
I realise that on Livejournal, I'm almost certainly preaching to the choir, but I felt the need to get this out anyway.
This afternoon I read
Now, whilst I personally think Fifty Shades is an appallingly written book, I do think the film may turn out to be quite good in the right hands, and I think Matt would make an amazing Christian. Is that the point? No. The point is that no actor should be discriminated against based on their private life. If we allow actors' romantic lives to determine what roles they can and can't play, we are sentencing actors and actresses who are concerned about their careers to a lifetime in the closet.
There's also a serious double standard going on here. Nobody raises an eyebrow when a straight man is cast in a gay role. Nobody said that Heath Ledger was unrealistic in Brokeback Mountain because in real life he didn't really sleep with men. Sean Penn played a gay man in Milk, won an Oscar, and was praised for his daring, despite having had two high-profile marriages to women. And yet today Ellis stated that Matt playing Christian would be 'ludicrous', that the resulting press tour would be 'an embarrassing fiasco' and that what was needed was 'an intensely straight actor wanting absolutely to screw Ana Steele'. This makes so little sense that my mind boggles. How do we know any actor is 'intensely straight'? How do we know, even if the chosen actor is straight, that he will be attracted to the actress playing Ana, or that he will enjoy the BDSM lifestyle? We don't. We don't need to. That's why it's called acting. Christian, not the actor playing him, is the one that needs to want to 'screw Ana'.
I knew better than to hope that this opinion was limited to Ellis - I had already seen glimpses of it in Youtube comments - but I was pretty appalled to see that it was also relatively prevalent in the comments on the articles which report Ellis' tweets. People commenting they would be unable to believe him in the role because they know he's sleeping with a man, people commenting that he would be unable to construct any onscreen chemistry with a woman... it's enough to make me despair.
Matt is an excellent actor who plays a convincing straight man on White Collar and has led millions of women to fall for Neal Caffrey. If he wants the role, he deserves the chance to be considered, just like any other actor. We should not be pigeonholing actors as only able to play gay or straight roles, any more than we should stop married actors from playing single roles.
I realise that on Livejournal, I'm almost certainly preaching to the choir, but I felt the need to get this out anyway.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-09 05:24 am (UTC)People are stupid. :(
no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-09 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-09 11:12 am (UTC)I just can't believe how intolerant some people can be and I need to stop thinking about this now because it makes me so angry and sad.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-09 01:07 pm (UTC)*deep breath*
Matt Bomer is, quite frankly, one of the most beautiful men ever. And from what I've seen, a really classy guy and a great actor. I really don't understand this double standard we apply to (mostly male) actors. You can be straight and play gay, but never the reverse. Why do we never question the ability of an actor to play a happily married person when they have openly stated that they'll never settle down? Or their ability to play a soldier when they've never been in combat? Or...all of those things.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 12:55 am (UTC)I just hope most casting directors are above this line of thinking and ignore public opinion!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-09 02:18 pm (UTC)There are numerous gay and bi actors who play straight roles all the time, but you can see why so many of them stay closeted.
Yes, in my mother's time, she found Rock Hudson soooo unbelievable as Doris Day's love interest. My personal kid crush - George Takai gosh I never could have believed him as Zulu if I knew he was gay! Ditto Richard Chamberlain (yes, I am old).
When I watch TV or a movie all I'm interested in is whether the story and acting is good. Everything else - I NO CURR!
no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-09 04:06 pm (UTC)Yes, because ~clearly~ it's impossible for a gay man to convincingly play a straight man. I mean, no one *really* believes Barney Stinton is into girls because he's played by Neil Patrick Harris. /sarcasm
And obvs this person didn't see Magic Mike, because that required some serious Matt Bomer grinding up against the ladies and working it.
me gustaActually, now that I think about it, I think whenever my mom mentions 50SoG to me, I'm going to imagine Matt as Christian. Because yes.no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 04:19 pm (UTC)This reminds me of Rupert Everett and how his career basically ended once he came out. And how Ellen's career took a ten-year nosedive when she came out. This kind of talk is SO harmful. Which I guess was his intent.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-10 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-13 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-14 11:40 pm (UTC)Desperate Housewives turn, but we really need a Tom Cruise/Leonardo DiCaprio level star in a sexsexsexsex and more sex kind of part.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-15 12:10 am (UTC)I'm actually trying to think of a gay actor in a lead role even in just a rom/com with fade outs and I can't (not a modern one anyway!). The closest I can think is NPH in HIMYM, and that's straight comedy and we barely even get to see him kiss anyone. (I also saw Ellis argue the other day that NPH was purposefully cast because he was gay and it was a sort of meta-joke with the audience, which I don't agree with but...anyway. We definitely need it to happen outside of comedy where that can be used as an excuse).
LOL @ 'mostly by Barrowman'! Bless him.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-15 12:20 am (UTC)Of course there's probably tons of gay actors doing the Romantic Coms that we just don't know about, but as for being out, maybe that one that Rupert Everett did with Madonna? He played gay, but he had sex with her, right? (Never actually saw it myself.)
no subject
Date: 2012-08-15 12:43 am (UTC)But as for straight roles I can't think of any out men playing them. Although, I can't think of many out actors at all, come to think of it - probably due to the reasons in this post >:(
*sigh*